By now you know this summer will be difficult for you, our riders, as track work at Penn Station will send most of our weekday trains to Hoboken.  We know this will make your trip more difficult, especially if you currently commute to Penn Station, New York on Midtown Direct trains.

We will continue to do everything we can to make the summer as painless as possible for you.  We have been fighting for you concerning this summer's service changes since we first learned about them. 

John Bobsin has been working hard to keep you informed on this web site, and we commend him for this much-needed and very valuable effort.  We will be glad to share whatever information we have that will take some of the pain out of your summer trips and commuting.  We will do the best we can to keep you informed in a manner that will improve your transit experience.  Please continue to check with us here on this site, and read our newsletter, the Railgram.

We thank you for your interest, and we hope you will join the Lackawanna Coalition, so you can help us to advocate for better transit for YOU.

DAVID PETER ALAN, Chair

Existing entrance to the Penn "rabbit warren"

In three years or so, if schedules are to be believed, a sparkling addition will open to the crowded subterranean rabbit warren that is today's Penn Station in Manhattan. It's the Moynihan Station (or "Train Hall"), created from the underutilized post office across 8th Avenue from today's Penn Station, which is actually the basement of Madison Square Garden, the original station having been razed in the 1960s to make way for the Garden. The Moynihan addition will boast wide open spaces, sunlight from above, sparlking train announcement boards, and an array of shops and businesses.  Artists' renderings of the new space include train announcement boards showing departures for Washington, Boston, Ronkonkoma, Chicago, Port Washington . . .

What's missing? Any indication that NJ Transit has any connection to Penn Station at all, despite the fact that nearly half the trains using the station are operated by NJT. Most of the platforms used by NJT are directly accessible from the new Moynihan annex, which will be convenient to the housing being built and many new jobs in the Hudson Yards area between Moynihan and the Hudson River, so many NJT riders could be expected to take advantage of the new facility.

Why is NJT conspicuously absent in the design of Moynihan? It turns out that there are two platforms in Penn Station, used almost exclusively by NJT, which are not long enough to allow stairways to reach the Moynihan facility: these platforms serve tracks 1 through 4.  At one time there was a plan to extend these platforms, which would allow NJT to use the platform for 10-car trains, which now are restricted to longer platforms; but the plan has fallen by the wayside. It's impossible to connect the existing, shorter platforms to Moynihan, as the 8th Avenue subway tracks cross overhead at the end of the platorms, so no stairs or escalators can be built there. Extending the platforms might be expensive, as reconstruction of the access tracks would be necessary.

Why won't NJT be mentioned in the Moynihan "train hall?" A facile explanation might be that Moynihan is a project of Amtrak and New York State, neither of which can be expected to protect the interest of New Jersey train riders. There is a technical explanation, too: if riders come to Moynihan expecting to depart on NJT trains, and if their trains are announced for tracks 1 through 4, they will have no easy way to get to those tracks. They would be faced with a long underground detour, eventually  through the Long Island Rail Road and Amtrak portions of Penn Station, possibly as much as 1000 feet of hoofing before reaching their train, if they can make the journey at all in time to catch it.  The bulk of NJT trains could be easily reached from Moynihan, but the inaccessibility of these two platforms give Moynihan designers an excuse to exclude NJT completely.

The Lackawanna Coalition believe that this situation is inexcusable, and resolved at its May 22, 2017 meeting to call on NJT and NJ state legislators to include the extension of the two platforms in the Fiscal Year 2018 capital budget; to complete the project by 2020; and to work with the developers of Moynihan to "make certain that all the  needs of NJ Transit customers are included in the Moynihan Train Hall."

The candidates for governor in this year's election cycle in New Jersey have a wide array of ideas about how to improve transit in the Garden State, according to reporting by Claude Brodesser-Akner in the Star-Ledger (May 22).

There are five Republican candidates:

Lt. Gov. Kim Guadagno promised to conduct an audit of the state's transportation fund, to end what she called the "mayhem" at NJ Transit. She said what the state needs is an "evidence-based" transportation funding formula, saying that present policy is "the worst public policy to come out of Trenton in a generation." She'd like a new Penn Station and bus terminal in Manhattan; complete the Gateway trans-Hudson tunnel; added ferry service; and new express trains.

Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli  said the state should immediately target a "significant portion" of revenues from the recent gas tax increase to "address the NJ Transit crisis," and vowed to stop raiding NJT's capital budget to cover operating expenses. He also focused on cutting expenses by combining state agencies and, like Guadagno, wants to build Gateway, saying as she did, it should be done with federal funding. Ciattarelli also wants to renegotiate income tax rules with New York State, so that New Jersey residents who work in New York would pay income taxes to New Jersey, not New York.

Nutley town commissioner Steve Rogers promised a management study of NJ Transit, and to hold NJT supervisors responsible for the system's performance. He also would like to see innovative options like monorails, light rail, waterways, and air transport.

Hirsch Singh, also running for the Republican nomination, says his engineering background qualifies him to address inefficiencies in the state's transportation fund; but he'd also repeal the recently-passed gas tax hike and focus on legalized marijuana as a new source of infrastructure funding.

Six Democratic candidates also weighed in:

Phil Murphy, the Democratic front-runner, said the state needs a mutli-hundred-million-dollar proposal to fix NJT, and didn't rule out new taxes to accomplish this.  He called for an emergency manager, and an audit, and said that until Penn Station's problems get fixed there should be "indefinite" cross-honoring of tickets with PATH, ferries, and buses. Murphy too supports the federally-funded Gateway project.

Former US Treasury undersecretary Jim Johnson wants to end political appointees at NJT and says he has  "unified vision" for NJT.  He advocates better maintenance programs, including "predictive maintenance," and better data sharing among state agencies, and rail service to Glassboro in South Jersey.

Activist Bill Brennan called for new taxes to support transit, including taxes on marijuana sales and on high-salaried executives. He wants to focus on "green" infrastructure, and converting Madison Square Garden to an inegrated bus and train terminal.

Assemblyman John Wiesniewski, chair of the Assembly's transportation committee, emphasized the need to eliminate patronage appointments at NJT and at the Port Authority, and to focus the Port Authority on transportation.  He wants better transit for working-class people, saying the state should improve transit from affordable housing to employment hubs for a population sector that disproportionately depends on transit.

State Senator Raymond Lesniak advocates more citizen participation and public control over NJT, saying riders deserve a direct voice in NJT operations.

Tenafly Councilman Mark Zinna vowed to "reinvigorate" NJT with a unified fare system, ending raiding capital funds for operations, and infrastructure improvements including extending the No. 7 subway line from Manhattan to New Jersey, and the A Train subway line over the George Washington Bridge and as far as Paterson He said he would hold President Trump to his infrastructure campaign promises, and would include Amtrak's Gateway in the package.

The primary election on June 6 will, presumably, reduce the race to single candidates for each party, and thereafter the debate about transit will no doubt become a bit sharper.

Citing a "crisis" and New York's Penn Station, New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo wrote President Trump on May 21, asking that the President recognize the situation as an emergency and therefore provide funds to fix the problem. Cuomo wrote, "I request that the federal government treat this as an emergency situation and provide funding for the short-term Penn construction and transportation alternatives and facilitation of a long-term resolution for Penn Station." Cuomo cited the large number of users of Penn Station, noting that more than half of them are New Yorkers using the Long Island Rail Road, the "deplorable condition" of what he called "the state of disrepair," and the projected impact of "emergency" repairs now scheduled by Amtrak. He lamented that "only now" has Amtrak announced the severity of service cuts that will be necessary to undertake the repairs, scheduled for two intervals in July and August, and likely to continue again in 2018. Cuomo said he foresees a "summer of agony." The letter went on to question Amtrak's ability to manage and operate the station, and expressed Cuomo's support for extensive investment in a new, improved station complex, which Cuomo said could be part of what President Trump has proposed as a one-trillion-dollar nationwide infrastructure improvement program.

The letter from Gov. Cuomo can be read here.

Blocked passageway at Hoboken, now reopened

Since an inbound NJ Transit train crashed through the bumper block on Track 5 at the railroad's Hoboken terminal on September 29, 2016, a critical pedestrian passage has been closed.  The passageway has now reopened, eliminating a detour that most riders had to endure: a circular trip through the terminal's main waiting room and then through a narrow door that leads to exits to the street, the adjacent bus terminal, and most importantly, to the PATH rapid transit system. NJT had previously announced that the passageway would not reopen until June. The detour route often became clogged in peak hours, even dangerously so when passenger loads swelled during recent incidents when trains were diverted to Hoboken from New York's Penn Station. Now passengers from the bulk of the station's tracks can walk directly to the exits, using the walkway at the end of the tracks rather than the detour.

The accident, which killed a bystander in the station and injured a number of riders on the train, caused extensive damage to the historic terminal's structure. Full repairs wil not be completed for several years, owing to the complexity of repairing the architecturally significant parts of the damaged train shed and terminal building.

Regular users of New York's embattled Penn Station don't need to be told about their daily travails. They might appreciate, but don't need, a behind-the-scenes tour to confirm what they already know. (If you haven't already had a guided behind-the-scenes tour of the station and the decaying Hudson River tunnels, well, you probably aren't a politician.) The latest beneficiaries learning what users already know are a group of New Jersey politicians, who got the royal treatment on Friday, May 12, according to reporting by Larry Higgs (contributions by Jonathan D. Salant and the Associated Press) for NJ Advance Media (and printed in the Star-Ledger, May 13.)  Their tour included riding in a special rail inspection car -- seats guaranteed -- equipped with floodlights to enable guests to observe conditions in the under-the-river tunnels, which were flooded in Hurricane Sandy more than four years ago.

"I call it frightening"

said State Sen. Teresa Ruiz (D-Essex). "In a regular passenger train you can't see what's surrounding you."  Duh.

"It's amazing that they actually get trains in and out"

said State Sen. Loretta Weinberg (D-Bergen," who went on to propose what she said was a solution: "What's important is Amtrak, NJ Transit, and the Long Island Rail Road come up with a schedule so riders know the dates and times when outages will take place." Presumably, Sen. Weinberg was referring to the planned reduction in service to be caused by Amtrak work beginning July 7, not outages resulting from unpredictable events such as train derailments, flooding, and the like.

"It's not pretty, it's chaotic and disorientating,"

said Sen. Joy Kyrillos (R-Monmouth). "When you get off a train, you don't know where you are." Well, regular riders figure it out, after a few hundred trips at least.

"Frankly, it's ugly and vulnerable, particularly the tunnels,"

said Assemblyman John McKeon (D-Bergen), who said "we saw it through the eyes of a commuter."

With service disruptions at New York's Penn Station occurring on an almost-daily basis, criticism of station owner Amtrak's operation of the facility has been mounting.  In response, according to reporting by Patrick McGeehan in the New York Times (May 12), Amtrak President Wick Moorman on May 11 proposed that a private company take over Amtrak's management of its portion of the station concourses, and that he hoped that NJT and LIRR would do the same.  Seemingly, Moorman did not mention operation of the vital tracks and platforms beneath the concourses. Moorman said a model for his proposal was airport operation, in which a common operator serves multiple airlines.  This wasn't enough for the governors of New York and New Jersey, Andrew Cuomo and Chris Christie, who countered in a joint letter the same day, saying that Amtrak should turn over operation of the entire station to a private operator. They wrote, "A professional, qualified, private station operator must be brought in to take over the repairs and manage this entire process going forward. We must have the right to approve any private contractor that Amtrak selects in response to our request and the record of failure causing these problems at Penn Station."

Up to 25% of NJ Transit's 63 peak  hour trains would have to be cancelled or rerouted from New York's Penn Station when Amtrak's first midweek infrastructure work period begins on July 7, according to statements by Amtrak President Wick Moorman, and reported widely in media, including by Larry Higgs for NJ Advance Media. The work period is scheduled to run from July 7 to 25, with a second interval from August 4-28; additional work periods are being planned for 2018. Moorman said that the 25% estimate is an upper estimate, but that up to five platform tracks at the station might have to be closed.

Amtrak said all the station's railroads would issue revised schedules by the end of the week of May 15. For its part, Amtrak said it would reduce its usage of Penn Station, partly by terminating some trains in Newark, N.J. During some of the recent service interruptions, Amtrak terminated its Keystone Service trains to and from Harrisburg at Newark.

A familiar way for NJ Transit to deal with traffic problems at Penn Station is to reroute Midtown Direct trains (those serving the Morris & Essex and Montclair-Boonton lines from New York) to Hoboken. If Moorman's numbers are taken literally, up to 16 NJT trains would have to be cancelled or rerouted. But depending on how "peak hours" are calculated, simply rerouting these Midtown Direct trains may be sufficient to satisfy Moorman's worst-case scenario. NJT has promised full description of how they will cope with Amtrak's work plans, saying "Once a service plan is finalized, an extensive communications outreach will be announced to allow our customers sufficient time to react and plan their commute accordingly as Amtrak upgrades its infrastructure in the upcoming months. "

Transit problems have become a topic for most of the candidates hoping to succeed NJ Gov. Christie, whose term expires next January; Christie is term-limited and cannot run again. Nick Corasanti reported the story in the New York Times (May 9). The leading Democratic candidate, Philip D. Murphy, acknowledged that New Jersey has a transportation crisis, and that a new tax "potentially" might be the only solution, although he stressed that there are many options on the table. Voters seem to be in tune with the idea that something must be done; a recent Quinnipiac University poll said that 84% of likely voters favored a new trans-Hudson rail tunnel; 65% disapproved of Gov. Christie's handling of transportation issue. Christie famously stopped an earlier Hudson tunnel project, citing costs and features; since then, there has been little progress on new tunnels, and Christie has also cut NJ Transit's state subsidy by 90%.

Most of the Democratic and Republican candidates agree that Amtrak's Gateway project, which includes new tunnels, are "vital;" and that overhauls of both New York's Penn Station and Port Authority Bus Terminal are necessary.  Candidates also seem to agree that an audit of NJ Transit to identify waste and mismanagement would be a good idea, and that political appointments to transit agencies should cease. Gov. Christie's Lieutenant Governor, Kim Guadagno, who is running for the Republican nomination, called the political appointment process "the worst public policy to come out of Trenton in a generation."

On specifics, the candidates have a variety of proposals. Mr. Murphy called for indefinite cross-honoring of NJT tickets on PATH and ferries, a manager to oversee relations with other transit agencies, and better apps to inform riders of delays.  He also said a dedicated funding source for NJT is needed, but that there were also other ways to guarantee NJT funding.

The increase in the gasoline tax last year allowed many transportation projects to resume, but Ms. Guadagno opposed it, saying that it's important to examine spending in Trenton, and bring all agencies responsible for infrastructure under common management.  Her Republican rival, Assemblyman Jack Ciattarelli, also wants agency reorganization, a new tax agreement with New York State, and called for using the moneys collected from drivers' licenses and other fees to improve infrastructure. The fees currently go into the state's general fund.  Democratic candidate Jim Johnson, for his part, unveiled a transit and infrastructure plan in late April, triggered by a number of transit snafus. He wants to cut fraud and waste, data-sharing among transportation agencies, tax reform, "predictive" instead of deferred maintenance, and completion of a proposed rail line between Glassboro and Camden.

Democratic Assemblyman John Wisniewski, with long experience in transportation issues, called for changes in the state's Transportation Trust Fund, additional rail capacity including the so-called Monmouth-Ocean-Middlesex proposed line, train station renovation, and refocusing the Port Authority on interstate transportation (instead of airports).

All of the candidates seem interested in transit issues, but their personal experience with public transit varies. Mr. Murphy declined to say when he has used transit; Ms. Guadagno commuted by NJT from Little Silver to Newark in her former job as a federal prosecutor; Mr. Johnson uses the PATH to travel to New York.  Mr. Wisniewski reported that he used to take the train from South Amboy to Newark and says rail is his favorite means of travel to New York, although he says these days he's wary of rail's reliability: for a recent meeting, he said, "I couldn't afford to be late. I had to drive in."

According to the union representing NJ Transit's conductors, more than 240,000 fares went uncollected on NJ Transit's trains last year, apparently due to crowded trains and lack of staffing. According to a letter the union sent to NJT, the uncollected fares might represent $5.5 million in lost revenue. The story was first reported by the New York Times (by Emma. G. Fitzsimmons, and printed May 8), and quickly picked up by other media. The Times story also reported that NJT will have to pay about $1 million in fees to other transit operators for "cross-honoring" arrangements in which NJT riders can use non-NJT services in emergency conditions; the relationship of this to lost ticket revenues was unclear. The data were from forms filled out by the train crews, reporting uncollected fares. While many riders may not have had their tickets inspected, the worst crowding typically occurs in peak hours, when most riders use weekly or monthly passes; not checking such riders does not incur any loss in revenue.  In addition, an increasing fraction of single-trip riders now purchase and activate tickets on their smartphones; these "e-tickets," as well, don't need to be inspected as they are already paid for.

In many transit systems, onboard ticket inspection is not regularly performed; in those systems, tickets are not sold on board trains or buses, and only random inspections are done: riders caught without valid tickets typically incur heavy fines. Such systems are already familiar to users of NJT's light rail lines, and on the "Select Bus Service" lines in New York City. If NJT's rail lines were to be converted to this "proof-of-payment" system, any losses might well be reduced.  But this  might also require fewer onboard workers, which might not be something the train conductors' union would welcome.